This week’s Monday Touch Point highlighted how temporary distortions are complicating the reading of Austin’s housing market, even as underlying trends become clearer. January weather disruptions delayed listings and pendings, but beneath that noise, supply growth is slowing, new listings are running below last year, and activity is becoming increasingly submarket-specific. Sold data remains weak due to late-2025 contract slowdowns, while leading indicators such as the new-listing-to-pending ratio and activity index are stabilizing or improving. Elevated price reductions and withdrawals continue to reinforce a central reality: buyer behavior is being driven by value alignment and affordability, not optimism or rate headlines, and outcomes now depend on disciplined pricing and hyper-local strategy.
Austin’s Market Signals Are Improving, but Context Matters
This week’s Monday Touch Point focused on separating noise from signal in the Austin real estate market. January closed with data that, at first glance, looks mixed. Sold activity is weak, headlines are lagging reality, and many consumers are still reacting to backward-looking indicators. But when you focus on leading indicators, especially new listings, pendings, and the activity index, the market is showing clear signs of stabilization and selective strength.
The most important takeaway right now is that weather events and seasonal distortions are heavily influencing short-term numbers. The January freeze delayed listings, canceled showings, and pushed pendings into future weeks. That matters when interpreting ratios and weekly drops.
New Listings vs Pending Activity
The new listing-to-pending ratio remains the most reliable leading indicator we track. After six straight weeks of underperforming last year, the market has now posted four consecutive weeks outperforming the same weeks in 2025. That is encouraging.
January finished with approximately 1,291 pendings and 1,571 active under contract listings, producing a ratio near 67, only slightly below January 2025’s 69. On a year-over-year basis, new listings were down about 5 percent for the month, while pendings were down roughly 8 percent. This keeps January broadly in line with last year, despite severe weather disruptions. The key detail is supply. Fewer new listings are entering the market compared to last year, which limits inventory growth and supports activity where demand exists.
The Sold Data Problem and Why It’s Lagging
The most striking statistic from January is the 22.6 percent year-over-year drop in sold properties. Even adjusting for population, sold activity is down more than 24 percent. That is a large decline, and it will influence comps, pricing conversations, and appraisals.
However, sold data reflects decisions made in November and December, not today’s demand. The weakness in solds is the delayed consequence of fewer pendings late last year. Leading indicators are already improving, which means sold numbers should recover over the next several months.
Agents must understand this distinction clearly. Pricing and negotiations must acknowledge lagging comps, but strategy should be guided by current activity, not outdated momentum.
Inventory and Activity Index Trends
Active inventory remains contained. Current active listings sit around 12,764, up roughly 11 percent year over year, far lower growth than many expected. Pending listings are actually slightly higher than the same date last year, up about 1 percent.
The activity index continues to improve. Several zip codes have reached 12-month record highs, with some areas firmly back in multiple-offer territory. Importantly, activity gains are highly localized. One zip code can be competitive while a neighboring area remains sluggish. Hyper-local data matters more now than ever.
Roughly one-third of tracked zip codes are under four months of inventory, and more than half are under five months. That is a materially healthier environment than headline narratives suggest.
Pricing Reality and Market Bifurcation
January pricing data reinforces a bifurcated market. The median sold price declined month over month by roughly $19,000 and is essentially flat year over year. The bottom quartile of the market is down about 5 percent, while the top quartile is still appreciating modestly.
This means quality, location, and price discipline matter more than timing alone. Well-positioned homes in strong submarkets are still selling competitively, while marginal inventory faces pressure.
Rates, Bonds, and the Week Ahead
Mortgage rates are holding steady near recent levels, with conventional rates around 6.25 percent and FHA and VA below 6 percent. This week is critical for rates due to heavy Treasury supply, labor data, and inflation expectations.
Manufacturing data surprised sharply to the upside, signaling economic expansion. That is positive for the economy but creates upward pressure on rates as capital rotates away from bonds. Inflation data next week will likely be the next major rate catalyst.
Big Picture Outlook
Austin has already absorbed most of its price correction. Roughly 85 percent of the adjustment appears complete, and leading indicators suggest the worst is behind us. While sold data will take time to recover, demand signals, constrained supply, and improving activity point toward stabilization and selective growth. This is no longer a one-speed market. Success now depends on reading leading indicators, understanding submarket dynamics, and explaining data clearly to clients.
Austin Housing Market Questions and Answers
1. Why are sold home numbers so weak even though some market indicators are improving?
Sold data is a lagging indicator that reflects buyer behavior from 30 to 90 days earlier, not current market conditions. The sharp year-over-year decline in sold properties we are seeing now is largely the result of weaker pending activity in November and December, when affordability pressure, rate volatility, and seasonal slowdown combined. In January, sold volume was down more than 22 percent year over year, which is significant and will impact comps and appraisal conversations. However, leading indicators such as the new listing-to-pending ratio and the activity index have begun to stabilize or improve, signaling that demand is not collapsing today. This disconnect is why agents must understand timing. What closed in January reflects last year’s hesitation, not current buyer intent. If pending activity continues to normalize, sold numbers should recover later in the spring.
2. What does it mean that new listings are running below last year, and why does that matter?
A year-over-year decline in new listings indicates that sellers are becoming more cautious about entering the market, either due to pricing uncertainty, affordability concerns, or a lack of urgency to sell. In January, new listings were down roughly 5 percent compared to the same month last year, which limits inventory growth even as demand remains uneven. This matters because inventory growth is the single biggest factor determining whether prices continue to fall, stabilize, or selectively recover. If new listings remain constrained through February and March, the market will not accumulate excess supply at the pace many expected earlier this year. That creates tighter conditions in certain zip codes, even while the broader market still feels slow. Fewer listings does not mean a strong market overall, but it does mean leverage is shifting back toward well-priced homes in active submarkets.
3. How should agents interpret the activity index in today’s market?
The activity index, calculated as pending divided by active plus pending, is the most reliable leading indicator for short-term market momentum. It captures buyer behavior in real time, unlike sold data or median prices. Right now, the activity index is improving in multiple zip codes and has reached 12-month highs in several areas, even while other locations remain near record lows. This divergence confirms that Austin is no longer a single market but a collection of micro-markets moving at different speeds. An activity index above 30 percent typically indicates multiple-offer risk, while readings below 15 percent signal weak buyer engagement. Agents should rely on this metric when advising on pricing strategy, negotiation posture, and offer strength, because it reflects what buyers are doing now, not what they did last quarter.
4. Why are price reductions and withdrawals still elevated if the market is stabilizing?
Price reductions and withdrawals remain elevated because many listings are still anchored to outdated expectations rather than current buyer behavior. While the pace of deterioration has slowed, pricing friction persists, especially in the lower quartile of the market where affordability constraints are most acute. In January, price drops significantly outpaced price increases, reinforcing that buyers are unwilling to stretch beyond perceived value even when inventory is tighter. Withdrawals and expirations are also rising as sellers test the market and then step back when pricing feedback is clear. Stabilization does not mean appreciation. It means the market is forcing alignment between price, condition, and location. Homes that meet that alignment sell. Homes that do not are corrected or removed.
5. What is actually driving buyer decisions right now: rates, prices, or something else?
Affordability and value alignment are the dominant drivers of buyer behavior, not interest rates alone. Rates matter, but buyers have largely adjusted to the current range and are now focused on monthly payment relative to perceived value. That is why we continue to see activity in well-priced submarkets even with rates holding steady above 6 percent. Buyers are comparing homes not just to last year’s prices, but to rents, income growth, and long-term ownership costs. When pricing aligns with those realities, buyers move forward. When it does not, they wait. This is why market outcomes today are determined more by micro-level pricing discipline than by macro headlines.